DEFINIÇÃO DE CRITÉRIOS DE SELEÇÃO PARA ESCOLHA DE PROJETOS SOCIAIS DE APLICAÇÃO DIRETA NA CONDIÇÃO SOCIAL DO INDIVÍDUO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24325/issn.2446-5763.v10i28p319-334Palavras-chave:
Projetos sociais, Multicritérios, Políticas públicas, Critérios de seleção.Resumo
Este trabalho teve como objetivo identificar um conjunto de critérios e subcritérios gerais para auxiliar o tomador de decisão na seleção do projeto social adequado. Realizou-se uma revisão da literatura através de análise bibliométrica, em que se utilizou critérios e subcritérios na aplicação de ferramentas de análise por multicritérios, como AHP e Fuzzy-AHP, para classificar o projeto. Foram selecionados vários trabalhos, de acordo com a maior relevância a maioria destes, de abrangência ao interesse coletivo da população com viés social.
A contribuição deste trabalho é definida pela lista de critérios e subcritérios de seleção para a escolha de projetos sociais, com ações de aplicação direta sobre o indivíduo. A lista organizada deverá ter a sua aplicação adaptada às características específicas do projeto e do público que sofrerá a ação. A conclusão estabelece uma recomendação para que o tomador de decisão, no processo de seleção de um projeto social a partir dos critérios gerais identificados, deverá levar em consideração as características do projeto social, se estas estão de acordo com a abrangência às necessidades da localidade e, se os objetivos e escopo permitirão atingir resultados que poderão ser mensurados.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Referências
AL KHALIL, Mohammed I. Selecting the appropriate project delivery method using AHP. International Journal of Project Management, nº 20, 2002, pp. 469–474.
ALHAZMI, Taghred; MCCAFFER, Ronald. Project Procurement System Selection Model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, nº 126(3), 2000, pp. 176-184.
ATANDA, Jubril. Developing a social sustainability assessment framework. Sustainable Cities and Society, nº 44, 2019, pp. 237-252.
AWAD, Jihad; JUNG, Chuloh. Extracting the Planning Elements for Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Dubai with AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). Sustainable Cities and Society, nº 76, 2022, pp. 103496.
BALDAM, Roquemar. Science Mapping (Bibliometria) with RStudio, Bibliometrix and international indexes. Ufes: Vitória, 2021. Disponível em: http://cope.ufes.br. Acesso: 13 mar. 2022.
BALL, R. An Introduction to Bibliometrics: New Development and Trends. [s.l.] Chandos Publishing, 2017.
CAPORALE, Diana et al. Multi-criteria and focus group analysis for social acceptance of wind energy. Energy Policy, nº. 140, 2020, pp. 111387.
CHAN, Albert et al. Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, nº 19(7), 2001, pp.699-718.
CUOGHI, Kaio; LEONETI, Alexandre. A group MCDA method for aiding decision-making of complex problems in public sector: The case of Belo Monte Dam. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, nº 68, 2019, pp. 100625.
FIGUEIREDO, Karoline et al. Sustainable material choice for construction projects: A life cycle sustainability assessment framework based on BIM and Fuzzy-AHP. Building and Environment, nº 196, 2021, pp. 107805.
GHIMIRE, Laxman; KIM, Yeonbae. An analysis on barriers to renewable energy development in the context of Nepal using AHP. Renewable energy, nº 129, 2018, pp. 446-456.
HAMURCU, Mustafa; EREN, Tamer. Strategic planning based on sustainability for urban transportation: An application to decision-making. Sustainability, nº 9 (12), 2020, pp. 3589.
HATEFI, Seyed; TAMOŠAITIENĖ, Jolanta. Construction projects assessment based on the sustainable development criteria by an integrated fuzzy AHP and improved GRA model. Sustainability, nº 4 (10), 2018, pp. 991.
HOSSEINI, Ali et al. Selection criteria for delivery methods for infrastructure projects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, nº 226, 2016, pp. 260 – 268.
HOWISON, J.; BULLARD, J. Software in the scientific literature: Problems with seeing, finding, and using software mentioned in the biology literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, nº 9 (67), 2016, pp. 2137-2155.
INTI, Sundeep; TANDON, Vivek. Towards precise sustainable road assessments and agreeable decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, nº 323, 2021, pp. 129167.
KUMARASWAMY, Mohan; DISSANAYAKA, Sunil. M. Developing a decision support system for building project procurement. Building and Environment, nº 36(3), 2001, pp. 337-349.
LI, Huimin et al. Sustainable supplier selection for water environment treatment public-private partnership projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, nº 324, 2021, pp. 129218.
LIJÓ, Lucía et al. Environmental and sustainability evaluation of livestock waste management practices in Cyprus. Science of the Total Environment, nº 634, 2018, pp. 127-140.
LIU, Ta-Kang; WENG, Tzu-Hsun; SHEU, Haw-Yang. Exploring the environmental impact assessment commissioners' perspectives on the development of the seawater desalination project. Desalination, nº 428, 2018, pp. 108-115.
LOMBARDI NETTO, Antonio et al. Multiple criteria assessment of sustainability programs in the textile industry. International Transactions in Operational Research, nº 3 (28), 2021, pp. 1550-1572.
LUU, D. T. et al. Parameters governing the selection of procurement system - An empirical survey. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, nº 10(3), 2003, pp. 209-218.
MASTERMAN, J.; Duff, A. The selection of building procurement systems by client organizations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1994.
MILLER, John et al. Toward a New Paradigm: Simultaneous Use of Multiple Project Delivery Methods. Journal of Management in Engineering, nº 16(3), 2000, pp. 58-67.
MONSONÍS-PAYÁ, Irene; GÓMEZ-NAVARRO, Tomás; GARCÍA-MELÓN, Mónica. Anticipating Environmental Burdens in Research and Innovation Projects—Application to the Case of Active and Healthy Ageing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, nº 10 (17), 2020, pp. 3600.
NESTICÒ, Antonio; FIORE, Pierfrancesco; D’ANDRIA, Emanuela. Enhancement of small towns in inland areas. A novel indicators dataset to evaluate sustainable plans. Sustainability, nº 16 (12), 2020, pp. 6359.
QIN, Guangyu et al. Comprehensive evaluation of regional energy internet using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on cloud model: A case in China. Energy, nº 228, 2021, pp. 120569.
VIEIRA, Fabiola Sulpino. Gasto federal com políticas sociais e os determinantes sociais da saúde: para onde caminhamos? Saúde Debate, Rio de Janeiro, nº 127, 2020, pp. 947-961.
WU, Yunna et al. Sustainability performance assessment of wind power coupling hydrogen storage projects using a hybrid evaluation technique based on interval type-2 fuzzy set. Energy, nº 179, 2019, pp. 1176-1190.
YILDIZ, Serkan et al. Built environment design-social sustainability relation in urban renewal. Sustainable Cities and Society, nº 60, 2020, pp. 102173.
ZHOU, Shan; YANG, Pu. Risk management in distributed wind energy implementing Analytic Hierarchy Process. Renewable Energy, nº 150, 2020, pp. 616-623.
ALHAZMI, Taghred; MCCAFFER, Ronald. Project Procurement System Selection Model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, nº 126(3), 2000, pp. 176-184.
ATANDA, Jubril. Developing a social sustainability assessment framework. Sustainable Cities and Society, nº 44, 2019, pp. 237-252.
AWAD, Jihad; JUNG, Chuloh. Extracting the Planning Elements for Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Dubai with AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). Sustainable Cities and Society, nº 76, 2022, pp. 103496.
BALDAM, Roquemar. Science Mapping (Bibliometria) with RStudio, Bibliometrix and international indexes. Ufes: Vitória, 2021. Disponível em: http://cope.ufes.br. Acesso: 13 mar. 2022.
BALL, R. An Introduction to Bibliometrics: New Development and Trends. [s.l.] Chandos Publishing, 2017.
CAPORALE, Diana et al. Multi-criteria and focus group analysis for social acceptance of wind energy. Energy Policy, nº. 140, 2020, pp. 111387.
CHAN, Albert et al. Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, nº 19(7), 2001, pp.699-718.
CUOGHI, Kaio; LEONETI, Alexandre. A group MCDA method for aiding decision-making of complex problems in public sector: The case of Belo Monte Dam. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, nº 68, 2019, pp. 100625.
FIGUEIREDO, Karoline et al. Sustainable material choice for construction projects: A life cycle sustainability assessment framework based on BIM and Fuzzy-AHP. Building and Environment, nº 196, 2021, pp. 107805.
GHIMIRE, Laxman; KIM, Yeonbae. An analysis on barriers to renewable energy development in the context of Nepal using AHP. Renewable energy, nº 129, 2018, pp. 446-456.
HAMURCU, Mustafa; EREN, Tamer. Strategic planning based on sustainability for urban transportation: An application to decision-making. Sustainability, nº 9 (12), 2020, pp. 3589.
HATEFI, Seyed; TAMOŠAITIENĖ, Jolanta. Construction projects assessment based on the sustainable development criteria by an integrated fuzzy AHP and improved GRA model. Sustainability, nº 4 (10), 2018, pp. 991.
HOSSEINI, Ali et al. Selection criteria for delivery methods for infrastructure projects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, nº 226, 2016, pp. 260 – 268.
HOWISON, J.; BULLARD, J. Software in the scientific literature: Problems with seeing, finding, and using software mentioned in the biology literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, nº 9 (67), 2016, pp. 2137-2155.
INTI, Sundeep; TANDON, Vivek. Towards precise sustainable road assessments and agreeable decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, nº 323, 2021, pp. 129167.
KUMARASWAMY, Mohan; DISSANAYAKA, Sunil. M. Developing a decision support system for building project procurement. Building and Environment, nº 36(3), 2001, pp. 337-349.
LI, Huimin et al. Sustainable supplier selection for water environment treatment public-private partnership projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, nº 324, 2021, pp. 129218.
LIJÓ, Lucía et al. Environmental and sustainability evaluation of livestock waste management practices in Cyprus. Science of the Total Environment, nº 634, 2018, pp. 127-140.
LIU, Ta-Kang; WENG, Tzu-Hsun; SHEU, Haw-Yang. Exploring the environmental impact assessment commissioners' perspectives on the development of the seawater desalination project. Desalination, nº 428, 2018, pp. 108-115.
LOMBARDI NETTO, Antonio et al. Multiple criteria assessment of sustainability programs in the textile industry. International Transactions in Operational Research, nº 3 (28), 2021, pp. 1550-1572.
LUU, D. T. et al. Parameters governing the selection of procurement system - An empirical survey. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, nº 10(3), 2003, pp. 209-218.
MASTERMAN, J.; Duff, A. The selection of building procurement systems by client organizations. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1994.
MILLER, John et al. Toward a New Paradigm: Simultaneous Use of Multiple Project Delivery Methods. Journal of Management in Engineering, nº 16(3), 2000, pp. 58-67.
MONSONÍS-PAYÁ, Irene; GÓMEZ-NAVARRO, Tomás; GARCÍA-MELÓN, Mónica. Anticipating Environmental Burdens in Research and Innovation Projects—Application to the Case of Active and Healthy Ageing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, nº 10 (17), 2020, pp. 3600.
NESTICÒ, Antonio; FIORE, Pierfrancesco; D’ANDRIA, Emanuela. Enhancement of small towns in inland areas. A novel indicators dataset to evaluate sustainable plans. Sustainability, nº 16 (12), 2020, pp. 6359.
QIN, Guangyu et al. Comprehensive evaluation of regional energy internet using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on cloud model: A case in China. Energy, nº 228, 2021, pp. 120569.
VIEIRA, Fabiola Sulpino. Gasto federal com políticas sociais e os determinantes sociais da saúde: para onde caminhamos? Saúde Debate, Rio de Janeiro, nº 127, 2020, pp. 947-961.
WU, Yunna et al. Sustainability performance assessment of wind power coupling hydrogen storage projects using a hybrid evaluation technique based on interval type-2 fuzzy set. Energy, nº 179, 2019, pp. 1176-1190.
YILDIZ, Serkan et al. Built environment design-social sustainability relation in urban renewal. Sustainable Cities and Society, nº 60, 2020, pp. 102173.
ZHOU, Shan; YANG, Pu. Risk management in distributed wind energy implementing Analytic Hierarchy Process. Renewable Energy, nº 150, 2020, pp. 616-623.
Downloads
Publicado
2024-04-13
Como Citar
Gomes, K. Q., Morais Eiras, K. M., & Corrêa Campos, C. (2024). DEFINIÇÃO DE CRITÉRIOS DE SELEÇÃO PARA ESCOLHA DE PROJETOS SOCIAIS DE APLICAÇÃO DIRETA NA CONDIÇÃO SOCIAL DO INDIVÍDUO. South American Development Society Journal, 10(28), 319. https://doi.org/10.24325/issn.2446-5763.v10i28p319-334
Edição
Seção
Artigos
