Foco e Escopo:
Esta revista é uma publicação quadrimestral da South American Development Society Journal de acesso aberto , com a colaboração técnica de uma equipe multidisciplinar de professores mestres e doutores. É dirigida a todos pesquisadores e interessados no desenvolvimento Sul Americano. É permitida a citação de artigos e dados desta Revista, desde que seja mencionada a fonte. As matérias assinadas não refletem, necessariamente, a opinião dos editores da Revista.
Organizar e disponibilizar informações que promovam o debate e o aprendizado que focalizam o desenvolvimento da Pesquisa Sul Americana.
Promover o debate e contribuir para melhorias de todas as atividades interdisciplinares que promovam o desenvolvimento do homem, seu meio e suas atividades.
Publico – alvo:
A South American Devolpment Society Journal é direcionada para pesquisadores, professores, estudantes, e especialistas em Logística e Operações, Comércio Exterior, Empreendedorismo, Meio Ambiente, Educação e demais temas Interdisciplinares.
O South American Development Society Journal tem periodicidade quadrimestral.
Politicas de Privacidade:
Os nomes e endereços informados nesta revista serão usados exclusivamente para os serviços prestados por esta publicação, não sendo disponibilizados para outras finalidades ou a terceiros.
Politicas de Acesso Livre:
Esta revista oferece acesso livre imediato ao seu conteúdo, seguindo o princípio de que disponibilizar gratuitamente o conhecimento científico ao público proporciona maior democratização mundial do conhecimento.
Política de Revisão por Pares:
O processo de avaliação dos artigos submetidos ocorre em duas etapas, e passa por um sistema de revisão dupla (double blind review) efetuada por avaliadores externos a a Instituição:
A Revisão por Pares inicia com uma avaliação preliminar do Editor Chefe, que analisa a adequação dos trabalhos de acordo com a linha editorial da Revista, sua adequação ao escopo, e aos aspectos como contribuição e ineditismo do texto. Somente os trabalhos considerados como relevantes para a comunidade e, em particular, para os leitores do periódico, prosseguirão para as demais etapas de avaliação.
Em seguida os originais dos artigos são encaminhados para a apreciação de dois pareceristas integrantes do Corpo de avaliadores externos a Instituição, conforme o sistema blind review. Os critérios para a avaliação dos artigos levam em conta relevância do tema, originalidade da contribuição nas áreas temáticas da Revista, clareza do texto, adequação da bibliografia, estruturação e desenvolvimento teórico, metodologia utilizada, conclusões e contribuição oferecida para o conhecimento da área.
Política Anti Plágio:
A Revista South American Development Society Journal, utiliza softwares e serviços para detectar a similaridade ou plágio em artigos científicos de acordo com normas CAPES publicadas em 2011.
Code of ethics
This journal is committed to ethics and quality in publication. We support standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in publishing in our journal: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, and the publisher. We do not accept plagiarism or other unethical behavior.
Duties of Editors:
Publication decision: The journal’s editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor is guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may consult with editorial board or reviewers in decision making.
Fair play: The editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality: The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and Conflicts of interest: The editor must not use unpublished information in his/her own research without the express written consent of the author. The editor should recuse him/herself from considering manuscripts in which he/she has conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers.
Involvement and cooperation in investigations: The editor should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Duties of Reviewers:
Contribution to Editorial Decision: Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Promptness: Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others.
Standards of Objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively, and referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Source: Peer reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. The peer reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors:
Reporting standards: Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism: The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication: An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently and/or publish the same article in different journals constitute unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources: Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source.
Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.
Authorship of the Paper: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works: When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Duties of the Publisher
We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Our articles are peer reviewed to ensure the quality of scientific publishing and we are also users of (CROSSREF SIMILARITY CHECK plagiarism software).
* This statement is based on Elsevier recommendations and COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Taxas cobradas pela Revista South American Development Society Journal
Esta revista científica não cobra qualquer valor para nenhum dos serviços, portanto não há taxas para submissão, análise, revisão ou publicação.
A Revista conta com indexadores Nacionais e Internacionais.